Skip to main content

Brief history of the Korean War


In 1950, as the international community was coming to terms with the aftermath of World War II, a new conflict broke out at the edge of the Asian continent.
It was a rare example of the Cold War turning hot - pitting the US and its allies against the USSR, North Korea and communist China. It was marked by dramatic swings of fortune and a devastating death toll.
Estimates vary, but at least two million Korean civilians, up to 1.5m communist forces, and around 30,000 US, 400,000 South Korean and 1,000 UK troops are believed to have died.                                    
A Korean girl with her brother on her back in front of an M-26 tank in Haengju
The suffering caused by the war continues to this day
For two of the three years that the war was under way, both sides were actually trying to negotiate a peace.
When a ceasefire was eventually signed, on 27 July 1953, no-one could have guessed that 50 years later, the two Koreas would remain technically at war.
A peace treaty has never been signed, and the border continues to bristle with mines, artillery and hundreds of troops.
North Korea Attacks
The Korean War was rooted in the country's complex recent history.
China, Japan and the Soviet Union had all jostled for influence over the Korean peninsula for years, before Japan's victory in the 1904-5 Russo-Japanese war made it the dominant power. Japan went on to formally colonise Korea in 1910 and ruled it until the end of World War II.
North Korean artillery unit
North Korea's bigger army initially had the upper hand
Just seven days before Japan's surrender at the end of that war, the Soviet Union took advantage of the changing fortunes and entered Korea. The USSR and the US later agreed to divide Korea at the 38th parallel, with the USSR in charge north of this line, and the US given jurisdiction over the south.
The Soviet Union established a communist dictatorship in the North under the leadership of Kim Il-sung, a former guerrilla leader who went on to surround himself in a cult of personality.
The US meanwhile held elections in the South and a President, Syngman Rhee, was chosen. Both occupying forces withdrew from Korea by 1949.
Map showing control of Korea in June 1950
The USSR left behind a well-equipped and -trained North Korean army. It had at its disposal 135,000 men, supported by tanks and artillery.
The South's forces, by comparison, numbered only 98,000 and were effectively a constabulary force. This was partly because the US was anxious to deprive the South of the means to invade the North.
Both sides wanted a reunification of the peninsula - the North dreamed of a wholly communist peninsula, and the South of a unified democracy.
The North was encouraged by its superior military balance, and an ill-advised statement in January 1950 by US Secretary of State Dean Acheson, which appeared to leave South Korea out of the US' military defence commitments.
In the early hours of 25 June 1950, when half of the South's troops were on leave for the weekend, North Korea launched a surprise, but well co-ordinated, attack across the 38th parallel.
US troops were hurriedly sent from bases in Japan. But they and their South Korean allies fared badly in the initial confrontation with the North.
Beating a hasty retreat, they managed to hold on to a small area surrounding the port city of Busan, in the peninsula's south-eastern corner, while the US called on the United Nations Security Council for support.
UN Security Council meeting 25 June 1950
The UN held emergency meetings before sending help
The Security Council passed a resolution which called on all members to help repel the invasion. The motion was only passed because the Soviet delegate, who would have certainly vetoed it, was absent because he was boycotting Security Council meetings until China was admitted to the UN.
Map showing control of Korea in September 1950
Fourteen UN nations - Australia, Belgium, Canada, Colombia, Ethiopia, France, Greece, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the Philippines, South Africa, Thailand, Turkey and the United Kingdom - agreed to help, committing a force of some 300,000. Most of the military support - 260,000 troops - was provided by the US, but the UK, Canada and Australia all made a substantial commitment.
While reinforcements were readied, it fell to the limited troops already in the country to hold on to the pocket of territory they still controlled. Ironically, they were helped by the fact that their defensive line was now so short - a perimeter of just 50 by 100 miles around Busan - that it was easier to defend.
North Korean's supply lines were also dangerously overstretched by their rapid advance.
It fell to the US Eighth Army commander, General Walton Walker, to rally the troops. He delivered a famous "Stand or Die" speech stressing that the force could no longer retreat.
The South Korean army and just four, ill-equipped US divisions managed to hold off the North's battalions for six weeks, but more US troops died in this battle than in any other operation during the war. They had bought time with blood.
While the North's army was buffeting the Busan enclave, the head of UN forces in the conflict, General Douglas MacArthur, prepared to reverse the course of the war.
On 15 September 1950 he launched a daring, sea-borne assault on the western port city of Inchon.
The goal of the Inchon landing, deep behind enemy lines, was to cut the North Koreans' supplies and communications and trap them between the troops landing in the western port and the Busan units.
A US Marine helicopter picks up personnel from a landing barge in Inchon Harbour
The Inchon landing was a high risk strategy
On 15 October, on Wake Island in the Pacific, General MacArthur and President Truman met to discuss the future of the war.


MacArthur reportedly told Truman that he was confident of early success in the North Korean offensive, and that he no longer feared Chinese intervention.
Just 10 days later, the Chinese army, which had been secretly massing at the border, made its first attack on the allies. In the days that followed, the allies' headquarters received intelligence that Chinese forces were hidden in the North Korean mountains, but this was disregarded.
Civilians crawl over a shattered bridge in Pyongyan to escape the advance of Chinese troops
China's entry into the war caused further upheaval
The Chinese troops withdrew, and the allies interpreted these initial skirmishes as simply defensive. Undeterred, General MacArthur ordered a bold offensive on 24 November to push right up to the Yalu River, which marked the border between North Korea and north-east China.
Map showing control of Korea in January 1951
He optimistically hoped this would finish the war and allow the troops "home by Christmas". But it was instead to mark yet another turning point in the conflict. The next day, about 180,000 Chinese "volunteers" attacked.
A shocked MacArthur told Washington: "We face an entirely new war."
He ordered a long and humiliating retreat - performed in sub-zero temperatures - which took the troops below the 38th parallel by the end of December.
As Chinese troops unleashed a renewed offensive, the allies were forced to withdraw south of Seoul in January 1951. Here, in the relatively open terrain of South Korea, the UN troops were better able to defend themselves. After a few more months of fighting, the front eventually stabilised in the area of the 38th parallel.
igh-risk strategy
General MacArthur's plan was risky because it meant braving unpredictable tides in a rocky port and scaling a 15-foot high seawall - only to face a fortified island in the harbour and a city that was occupied by strong North Korean forces. After preparatory bombardment, two battalions entered Inchon, beating down resistance but meeting no counter-attack.


Map showing control of Korea in October 1950
At the same time, the US Eighth Army broke free of the Busan corner and started pushing North. The North Koreans panicked and started fleeing, and by 25 September, the allies had recaptured Seoul.
The allies could have stopped at the 38th parallel, since South Korea was now liberated. But President Truman wanted to unify Korea under a single, pro-Western government.
General MacArthur therefore ordered a pursuit of the communist troops across the border. But Truman, fearing a wider war, stressed that MacArthur should stay clear of China.
China wanted North Korea to act as a buffer state. Beijing warned that it would enter the war if the troops crossed into North Korea, but these warnings were ignored.
source:BBC


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

किमची कोरिया का मुख्य नहीं बल्कि सह- भोजन(साइड डिश) है ।

<पारम्परिक कोरियाई भोजन का आनंद लेते कुछ वरिष्ठ साथी> भोजन मानव संस्कृति का सबसे महत्वपूर्ण हिस्सा है। कोरियाई संस्कृति भी इस कथन का पूरक है।   कोरिया का खाना यहाँ की सांस्कृतिक पहचान का एक   ऐसा हिस्सा जो भारत और पश्चिमी निवासियों के आहार और प्रचार से काफी अलग है   । कोरिया के भोजन विशेषकर अनाज ( खासकर चावल ) , मांस , और कुछ सब्ज़ियों पर जोर देता है । हालांकि अमेरिका , पूंजीवाद , पश्चिम का प्रभाव और औद्योगीकरण जैसे तत्वों के मेल के साथ यहाँ के लोगों ने पिज्जा , हैमबर्गर और   बीयर को भी अपनाया है ।   इसके अलावा जापानी सुशी और चीन के कुछ भोजन तथा दक्षिण पूर्वी एशिया और भारत के व्यंजनों की लोकप्रियता भी प्रमुख है।     कोरियाई भोजन में साधारणतः चावल , सूप या स्टू , और कई साइड व्यंजन रहते है और लगभग सभी खानों में साइड व्यंजन के रूप में किमची या मसालेदार सब्जियां रहती है । राष्ट्रीय आहार में किमची का सबसे ज्यादा ...

모디 "한국-인도 동반자관계, 아시아 성장·안정에 이바지"

나확진 특파원 = 나렌드라 모디 인도 총리가 "한국과 인도의 동반자 관계가 아시아의 성장과 안정, 번영에 이바지할 것"이라며 양국 협력의 필요성을 강조했다. 모디 총리는 27일 인도 뉴델리에서 열린 한-인도 비즈니스 서밋에 참석해 기조연설에서 이같이 말했다. 그는 인도에서 건너와 가락국 김수로왕과 결혼했다는 허 왕후 설화에서부터 불교의 전파, 한국을 '동방의 등불'이라고 부른 인도 시인 라빈드라나트 타고르 등을 언급하면서 양국 관련성을 강조했다. 그는 구자라트 주 총리로 재직 당시 방한 경험을 거론하며 "세계적인 브랜드를 만들고 유지하는 한국 국민을 존경한다"고 말했다. 그는 자동차, 철강, 조선, 주택, 도시개발, 철도, 에너지 등 여러 분야에서 두 나라의 협력 가능성이 크다며 양국이 협력해 아프리카 등 제삼국 시장으로도 함께 진출하자고 덧붙였다. 코트라와 조선일보, 인도경제인연합회(CII)가 공동 주최한 이번 행사에 백운규 산업통상자원부 장관, 송영길 한국·인도 국회의원 친선협의회장, 대한상공회의소 회장인 박용만 두산인프라코어 회장, 최태원 SK그룹 회장, 정의선 현대차그룹 부회장, 손경식 CJ그룹 회장, 조양호 한진그룹 회장, 조현준 효성그룹 회장, 권오준 포스코 회장 등이 참석했다. 모디 총리 외에 아룬 제틀리 재무장관, 수레시 푸라브 상공부 장관, 라비 샨카르 프라사드 정보기술부 장관과 마힌드라 그룹의 아난드 마힌드라 회장 등이 참석했다. 모디 총리는 박용만 회장 등 한국 경제인들과 별도로 간담회를 하고 인도 정부에 바라는 점과 투자 애로 등을 청취했다. 또 현대차가 만든 수소전기차 '넥쏘'에 정의선 부회장과 함께 탑승하기도 했다. 백운규 장관은 "조선, 자동차, 철강, 전자 등 한국이 경쟁력이 있는 분야에서 인도와 협력을 강화할 필요가 있다"면서 "스마트 시티와 전력 등 인도 인프라·에너지 분야에서는...

Teaming up Korea, India ...science and technology

Teaming up Korea, India ...science and technology N.K. has around 30,000 electron... Remote-control craft expand U.S... Half of singles have no interes... Banks to buy W1tr in toxic loan... FSC delays ruling on Lone Star’... Prosecutors discover more FSS m... Home-backed lending jumps W2.4t... Money supply growth declines to... Science and technology are two driving forces for the economies of South Korea and India, with tremendous potential for projects that link both sides. To capitalize on this potential, India’s Science and Technology Minister Pawan Kumar Bansal came to Seoul to take part in the first Ministerial Steering Committee meeting on May 4. Education, Science and Technology Minister Lee Ju-ho (left) with India Science and Technology Minister Pawan Kumar Bansal during the 1st India-Korea Science and Technology Ministerial Steering Committee. (India Embassy) “We agreed on the need to promote human resource exchange and joint research in promising next-generation...